constructive elements
i don't really like to rant, so i decided to put some constructive element into my blog. HOWEVER, dis does not mean i won't dish out stuff if something annoys me. and u all heard the saying, the dog that barks dont bite? well dis "dog" don't bark - at all -, so ppl beware, hehe
(on a side note, i was born in the year of the dog, how odd? actually it would be a lot more strange if i was born in the year of rooster or year of the rat...)
anyway, wat i really want to talk about is, "which is tougher? being a man or being a woman?"
first all, i'm not goin to list pros and cons, because man and woman are different, so the two gender does not have anything that can be compared with. for example, man does not have periods, if man is capable of having periods then we can compare it with the female's, but because we can't so we wont.
so knowin that, the only comparison that can be made is by comparing within our own gender, so if we set some kind of standard for woman and man then we can compare the ratio of man and woman that is above or below the set standard. (let it sink in, it will make sense eventually)
but, it is hard to set a particular standard, because in choosing a standard for man and woman then we need to find an equivalent male and an equivalent female, but since we can't compare the male and female in the first place such standard just wouldn't make sense or be fair.
after all that, the only thing that can be concluded is " its harder to be a man, if u don't know how to act like a man, and its easier to be a woman if you know how to act like a woman".
is it constructive enough? wat did u expect? a life lesson? hehe, nothing in life is free, u got to ficgure out things on ur own.
(on a side note, i was born in the year of the dog, how odd? actually it would be a lot more strange if i was born in the year of rooster or year of the rat...)
anyway, wat i really want to talk about is, "which is tougher? being a man or being a woman?"
first all, i'm not goin to list pros and cons, because man and woman are different, so the two gender does not have anything that can be compared with. for example, man does not have periods, if man is capable of having periods then we can compare it with the female's, but because we can't so we wont.
so knowin that, the only comparison that can be made is by comparing within our own gender, so if we set some kind of standard for woman and man then we can compare the ratio of man and woman that is above or below the set standard. (let it sink in, it will make sense eventually)
but, it is hard to set a particular standard, because in choosing a standard for man and woman then we need to find an equivalent male and an equivalent female, but since we can't compare the male and female in the first place such standard just wouldn't make sense or be fair.
after all that, the only thing that can be concluded is " its harder to be a man, if u don't know how to act like a man, and its easier to be a woman if you know how to act like a woman".
is it constructive enough? wat did u expect? a life lesson? hehe, nothing in life is free, u got to ficgure out things on ur own.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home